IN TH 236 Anup Sing State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appropriate Certiorari 22.05.2024 claim of th illegal, arb the nature benefit of Policy/Noti respondent particularly CWP-25652-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.25652 o Date of decision p Singh @ Anoop Singh Versus Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sanjay Ghalawat, Advoca for the petitioner. Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Ha Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Advoca Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocat HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ pet opriate writ, order or direction, particu orari, for quashing and setting aside 5.2024 (Annexure P-7), passed by resp of the petitioner(s) for employmen al, arbitrary and unreasonable; further nature of Mandamus, directing the fit of employment to the petitioner(s) i y/Notification dated 09.11.2010 (A ndent No.2, in respect of the a cularly when the said benefit has alrea 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5652 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-20.08.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate G, Haryana. dvocate for dvocate for respondent No.3. rit petition is for issuance of an particularly a writ in the nature of aside the impugned order dated by respondent No.1, whereby the oyment has been rejected, being further, for issuance of a writ in the respondents to extend the er(s) in terms of the Government 10 (Annexure P-3), issued by the acquisition of their land, s already been extended to other VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.21 16.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document similarly si and further same bene 10.05.2022 2015, CWP of 2019 and submits tha of the jud Court in CW State of H against wh Chief Secr Kumar and It is furthe titled “Ram preferred b also been d 09.02.2026 that the pre August 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-25652-2025 (O & M) arly situated landowners of the same v further directing the respondents to benefit of employment in terms of 5.2022 (Annexure P-4), passed by this , CWP No.2789 of 2015, CWP No.32 19 and CWP No.32143 of 2019. At the very outset, learned its that the present writ petition is liab e judgment dated 10.05.2022 (Anne t in CWP No.1150 of 2015 titled “Ra of Haryana and others”, along wit st which LPA No.76 of 2023 titled Secretary, Government of Haryan r and others” was allowed by the Di further submitted that the SLP (Civi Ramesh Kumar and others v. State rred by persons similarly situated to been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supre 2.2026. Accordingly, learned counsel the present writ petition may also be di Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, 20, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 same village, i.e. Khanpur Khurd; ts to grant the petitioner(s) the ms of the order/judgment dated by this Court in CWP No.1150 of No.3209 of 2015, CWP No.924 arned counsel for the petitioner is liable to be dismissed in view (Annexure P-4) passed by this Ramesh Kumar and others v. ng with connected writ petitions, itled “State of Haryana through ryana and another v. Ramesh the Division Bench of this Court. (Civil) Diary No.3768 of 2026 State of Haryana and others”, ted to the petitioners herein, has Supreme Court vide order dated ounsel for the petitioner submits o be dismissed in the same terms. if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.21 16.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document