Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3109 (ALL)

SURESH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLR/3381/2024 · 2026-05-04

Achal Sachdev

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3381 of 2024 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Sri Suneel Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 to 4 and learned AGA for the State are present. 2. None appears to press this revision on behalf of the revisionist, even in the revised call. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 to 4 states that revisionist has failed to appear before the court consistently. 4. Perusal of order sheet shows that the date is fixed in the present revision for admission, since the revisionist did not appear on 10.02.2026 and on 09.04.2026 the case is adjourned on the request of counsel for the revisionist and today also none appeared on behalf of the revisionist, which shows that the revisionist is not inclined to contest the revision. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. May 5, 2026 VKG Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Amit Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Soni Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Suneel Kumar (Achal Sachdev,J.) Suresh Sharma .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad