Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 1422 of 2024
Rabindra Mallik …. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M.K. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 08.01.2026
02.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.2924 of 2023 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur arising out of Kuakhia P.S. Case No.477 of 2023 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-A/ 294/ 323/ 325/ 506 of IPC.
3. By order dated 22.02.2024, this Court has passed the following order;
“1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the informant as opposite party No.2 in the case.
3. Issue notice to the newly added Opposite Party No.2 by Regd. Post with A.D. returnable within four weeks. p. 2
4. Requisites shall be filed by three working days peremptorily.
5. List this matter on 04.04.2024.
6. Till such time no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.” (Emphasized)
4. Admittedly, the order has not been complied.
5. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is dismissed for non- compliance of the peremptory order.
6. Registrar (Judicial) is requested to ensure that once there is non-compliance of the peremptory
order, the matters are again not listed.
Necessary corrective steps in this regard may be taken so that, there is no recurrence.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Santoshi