Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3095 (MAD)

B.SUGANYA DEVI v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR

WP/38154/2024 · 2026-03-24

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 38154 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 38154 of 2024 B.Suganya Devi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Registrar, Tirupur, Tirupur District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Thottipalayam Sub-registrar Office, Thottipalayam, Tirupur District. 3. Ramamani 4. Ramanathan @ Ramesh 5. Muthukumar @ Suresh 6. N. Kuppusamy 7. K. Vasanthi 8. M/s. Sree Lakshmi Knit Wears, Door No 20/3, Rajaji Nagar, 4th Street, Tirupur Corproaiton, Tirupur. 9. P.Srikanth 10.B. Kanchana ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the first and second https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 38154 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 Respondents to consider the representation dated 16.09.2024 and further directing the respondents 1 and 2 refuse to register the documents under Registration Act if the respondents 3 to 10 present the documents for registration based on the title traverse from forged unregistered wills dated 12.12.2001 and 02.01.2002 in S. No 394/ 2 and 410 of Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur Taluk and District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the first and second Respondents to consider the representation dated 16.09.2024 and further directing the respondents 1 and 2 refuse to register the documents under Registration Act if the respondents 3 to 10 present the documents for registration based on the title traverse from forged unregistered wills dated 12.12.2001 and 02.01.2002 in S. No 394/ 2 and 410 of Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur Taluk and District. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner obtained a decree from a suit in her favour, the respondents 3 to 10 intend to execute the document in respect of the subject survey number i.e., S.No.394/2 and 410 therefore, she made a representation dated 16.09.2024, not to register the documents in respect of the subject survey https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 38154 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 number, if any presented for registration. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that the representation has to be filed in a proper format along with fee, which has not been done by the petitioner. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents and perused the material available on record. 5. In view of the submissions made, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation in a proper format along with required fee. If any such representation or any document is presented by the respondents 3 to 10, the official respondents are directed to consider and pass orders on the same, after issuing notice and affording an opportunity of hearing / filing objections to the petitioner as well as the necessary parties. 6. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 38154 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN To 1. The District Registrar, Tirupur, Tirupur District. 2. The Sub-Registrar, Thottipalayam Sub-registrar Office, Thottipalayam, Tirupur District. WP No. 38154 of 2024 24-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis