IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 220 CWP-20882-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.08.2026 SANDEEP SINGH ALIAS SANDEEP SEHRAWAT ... Petitioner Versus HARYANA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Anuj Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Mehak Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents states that one of the objections raised in the present petition was that the order passed in review application was not of the competent authority which during pendency thereof, stands decided by the Board of Directors on 26.11.2025, a copy whereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner, in wake of which, he prays for withdrawal of the present case to challenge the same, if required. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 13.08.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.08.13 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document