IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Yunush Alias Unnas Union of India and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : None for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. LAPITA BANERJI Even in the second call, the appellant is not represented. No adjournment is sought for on represented on November 18, 2024 2. In the circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the present appeal is dismissed 3. Liberty to apply. 4. Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. August 18, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision : Yunush Alias Unnas Versus Union of India and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI None for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) Even in the second call, the appellant is not represented. No adjournment is sought for on his behalf represented on November 18, 2024 also. In the circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the present dismissed in default. Liberty to apply. Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5375-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision :18.08.2026 …Appellant …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Even in the second call, the appellant is not represented. No his behalf. The app+ellant was not In the circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the present Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.08.19 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document