Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3040 (MAD)

Sandra Dawn Collins v. Mr V.Rajaraman, I.A.S.,

CONT P/2303/2024 · 2026-04-07

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 Sandra Dawn Collins ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Mr V.Rajaraman, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary Government Of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 001. 2. Mr. Dr. K.S.Palanisamy, I.A.S., The Commissionerate Of Land Administration Ii Floor, Ezilagam, Chennai- 600 005. 3. Mr. S. Arun Raj, I.A.S., The Collector Chengalput District At Chengalput. 4. Mr. Arumugam, The Tahsildar Pallavaram Taluk, Pallavaram, Chengalput District. 5. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Reddy, The Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 015. ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience by not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 complying with the direction issued by this Court in W.P.No. 33019 of 2023 dated 22.11.2023. For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.Viswanathan For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Ramanlal Additional Advocate General asst by Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Contempt Petition has been instituted to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience by not complying with the direction issued by this Court in W.P.No. 33019 of 2023 dated 22.11.2023. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that in pursuance to the orders of this Court dated 22.11.2023 in W.P.No.33019 of 2023, encroachers are identified and the petitioner was also identified as an encroacher. Thereafter, notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) was issued. After affording opportunity to the parties, final order under Section 6 of the Act was passed. Thereafter, possession was taken by the Government and was handed over to Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) for development of railway projects. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 3. This being the factum, no adjudication is required. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 07-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To 1. Mr V.Rajaraman, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary Government Of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 001. 2. Mr. Dr. K.S.Palanisamy, I.A.S., The Commissionerate Of Land Administration Ii Floor, Ezilagam, Chennai- 600 005. 3. Mr. S. Arun Raj, I.A.S., The Collector Chengalput District At Chengalput. 4. Mr. Arumugam, The Tahsildar Pallavaram Taluk, Pallavaram, Chengalput District. 5. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Reddy, The Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 015. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.SURENDER, J. GD CONT P No. 2303 of 2024 07-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis