HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22067 of 2024 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Navin Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for State-respondents and Sri Aditya Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 5. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that this petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. May 5, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irshad Ahmad, Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditiya Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar Pandey, Mohan Yadav, Suneel Kumar Mishra (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Tasleem .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad