HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39886 of 2024 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the first informant and Shri B.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.555 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 333, 110, 105 of B.N.S., registered at Police Station Barhalganj, District Gorakhpur, during pendency of the trial. 4. It has been submitted by learned Senior counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and as per first information report, three named and two unknown persons are said to have assaulted the deceased Saraswati Devi by iron rod, lathi, danda, bricks and stones, as a result of which, one grievous injury has been received on the parietal region of the deceased and the deceased has died after 8 days of the incident. It is further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.09.2024 and the trial is not likely to conclude in near future, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prem Prakash Yadav, Roopesh Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Vinay Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sandeep Kumar Chaturvedi Byas Muni Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant and it has been submitted by them that the deceased has received grievous injury. 6. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant and as per first information report, three named and two unknown persons are said to have assaulted the deceased Saraswati Devi by iron rod, lathi and brick, as a result of which, one grievous injury has been received on the parietal region of the deceased and the deceased have died after 8 days of the incident and as per postmortem report, the cause of death has been shown due to ante-mortem injury (head injury). It is further submitted that the police has recovered the brick on the pointing out of the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.09.2024 and the trial is not likely to conclude in near future and the applicant is having o criminal history. 7. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Byas Muni Yadav involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek BAIL No. 39886 of 2024 2 any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. May 12, 2026 RKM BAIL No. 39886 of 2024 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad