108-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27856-2024 Date of decision: 22.07.2026 GRAM PANCHAYAT NANGAL KHURD ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.4-M.C. Sonepat. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the notification dated 03/06.07.2015 (Annexure P-1) and notification dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure P-5). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that at one stage, the land was shown as ownership of Gram Panchayat and thereafter, the same had vested in the Municipal Committee. It is submitted that subsequently the land has been de-notified by the Municipal Committee in favour of the petitioner-Gram Panchayat but it is the case of the petitioner that the authorities are not handing over the possession of the land in question. It is submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceeding/suit and also to raise all the pleas which are available to the petitioner, in accordance with law. MANISHA 2026.07.27 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-27856-2024 2 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner institutes any such petition/suit, the same would be considered independently in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 22, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.27 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document