Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4910 of 2024 Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Sri Shivam Tripathi, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made in the instant writ petition has been granted by the consolidation authorities, as such, the writ petition be disposed of as infructuous.
2. Sri Ashish Chand Nishad, learned standing counsel for the state- respondents has no objection to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner.
3. In view of the statement of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. May 12, 2026 C.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Gousia Anjum Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Bindeshwari Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad