AJEET SAXENA AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/23788/2024 · 2026-05-11
Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Siddhartha Varma
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 3019 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 3019 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23788 of 2024 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Learned A.G.A. has filed short counter affidavit, which is taken on record.
2. In the affidavit, it has been stated that charge sheet in the instant matter has been submitted.
3. Learned A.G.A. states that instant writ petition has been filed challenging the F.I.R. No challenge there to be with regard to the charge sheet, therefore, the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. We find substance, in the argument of learned A.G.A. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. May 12, 2026 AKT Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Narayan Singh, Ram Bahadur, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ajeet Saxena And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad