Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110
CWP-30136-2024 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Paramjeet Kaur and another …Petitioners Versus Union of India and others
…Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Jangra, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Vibhor Bansal, Senior Panel Counsel and Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for Union of India-respondent No.1 Ms. Komal Bishnoi, Advocate for Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2
Mr. Kamil Nagpal, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate respondent No.6
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that first prayer sought in the petition has rendered infructuous. The petitioners with respect to second prayer may be granted liberty to avail remedies as permissible by law.
2.
In the wake of statement of learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, the petition stands disposed of with aforesaid liberty.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 27.07.2026 Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.27 13:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.