CWP-16028-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (238) CWP-16028-2024 Date of Decision : 22.07.2026 Punjab & Sind Bank & Another ...Petitioners Versus The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Ms. Mamta Malik Rewar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Seth, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.3 to 6. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an objection was raised before the Central Administration Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) that the excess amount paid can be recovered in terms of the affidavit given by the respondent herein and the same was argued but no finding has been recorded by the Tribunal. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to approach the Tribunal by filing review and if need arises, to file the fresh petition. 2. Ordered accordingly with liberty aforesaid. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE July 22, 2026 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No SHUBHAM 2026.07.24 11:13 I am the author of this document