278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.5013 of 2024 Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Manish Kumar …..Petitioner. Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and another .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Nitin Sansanwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Bali, Addl. P.P, UT, Chandigarh. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the complaint itself stands withdrawn, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.23 18:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.