CRM-M-47364-2024 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CRM-M-47364-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.07.2026 M/s M. N. Fashion ...Petitioner Versus Amrish Tiwari @ Ambrish Tiwari ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 for quashing of the impugned order dated 24.07.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana in Criminal Revision No. 24030 of 2022, whereby the summoning order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana in Complaint No. COMA-40009 of 2022 titled M/s M.N. Fashion v. M/s Slingshot Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. and others was set aside qua the respondent herein and the matter was remanded to the trial Court for passing a fresh order. The petitioner further seeks stay of the operation of the impugned order during the pendency of the present petition. 2. A perusal of the record reveals that during the pendency of the present petition, the learned trial Court, in pursuance of impugned order dated 24.07.2024, has reconsidered the matter afresh qua the respondent, vide order dated 25.03.2026, and after hearing the parties, passed a fresh order holding that no prima facie case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2026.07.23 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-47364-2024 (O&M) -2- is made out against the respondent and, consequently, dismissed the complaint qua him. Thus, the order dated 24.07.2024, which was the subject matter of challenge in the present petition, has already worked itself out and stands fully implemented by the learned trial Court. 3. In view of the subsequent development, the cause of action for maintaining the present petition no longer survives. Since a fresh order has already been passed by the learned trial Court in pursuance of the revisional order, no further adjudication is required in the present petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the subsequent order passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the complaint qua the respondent, it shall be open to the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available to it in accordance with law. Consequently, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of as such, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order passed by the learned trial Court, if so advised. 23.07.2026 (MANISHA BATRA) Waseem Waseem Waseem Waseem R. R. R. R. Ansari Ansari Ansari Ansari JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2026.07.23 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document