SMT. ASHA PANDEY v. DR. LAKSHMI SINGH, THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER (C.M.O.) AND ANOTHER
CAPL/6130/2024 · 2026-05-13
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2978 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6130 of 2024 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. The writ Court on 29.5.2024 while disposing of Writ-C No. 18791 of 2024 had directed the opposite party to decide the claim of applicant and following order was passed;
"1. Heard Shri Pratap Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pranjal Mehrotra and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondent.
2. Petitioner claims money for supplies made to respondent no.3 against invoice annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition.
3. Facts are not ascertained. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending or calling for a counter affidavit, at this stage.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction, subject to the petitioner filing a copy of this order along with self-attested copy of this writ petition before respondent no.3, that respondent may proceed to deal with and decide the petitioner's claim by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of compliance shown by the petitioner. Any amount found due and payable may be paid out to the petitioner within a further period of two months. If any approval is to be granted by respondent no.2 the same may be obtained within the same time." Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pratap Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Pranjal Mehrotra Smt. Asha Pandey .....Applicant(s) Dr. Lakshmi Singh, The Chief Medical Officer (C.M.O.) And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
2. Today instructions have come from the State side which are taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel informs the Court that payment of Rs. 8,64,000/- has been made to the proprietor of M/s Navya Agencies after deducing tax of Rs. 36000/-.
3. As payment has been made in pursuance of direction of writ Court, present contempt application is rendered infructuous and same stands dismissed as infructuous. Contempt notice stands discharged. May 14, 2026 Shekhar CAPL No. 6130 of 2024 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad