Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2977 (PNJ)

YOGITA JAIN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/37833/2024 · 2026-07-20

H S Grewal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-37833-2024 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 YOGITA JAIN ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bank. ***** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Ld. JMIC/Ludhiana in COMA-3877-2024 (date of Registration is 06.03.2024) titled as “ Union Bank of India Vs. Yogita Jain. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today. 3. A perusal of the record shows that the orders have been passed due to repeated non-appearance of the accused/petitioner before the trial Court. As such, I find no ground to interfere with the order dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Ld. JMIC/Ludhiana. 4. Consequently, the present petition is hereby dismissed. 20.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) Anjal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.07.22 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document