Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 1. T.Pari 2. R.Kandasamy 3. Liliyan Swarana Kalai 4. M.Kumar 5. C.Rajendran .. Petitioners in both Contempt Petitions Vs 1. Tmt.Kakarla Usha, I.A.S., Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. Thiru. Anshul Mishra, I.A.S., Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai – 08. .. Respondents in Cont.P.No.1647 of 2024 1. Thiru. Anshul Mishra, I.A.S., Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai – 08. Page Nos.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 2. Tmt.Kakarla Usha, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. .. Respondents in Cont.P.No.1657 of 2024 COMMON PRAYER : Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience and contempt of the order of this Court in W.A.Nos.1034 of 2020 and 1384 of 2019 dated 21.02.2023. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Vijayashankar in both Cont.Ps For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran in both Cont.Ps Additional Advocate General assisted by Mrs.P.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel for CMDA C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.) These Contempt Petitions have been filed for non-compliance of the judgment passed in W.A.Nos.1034 of 2020 and 1384 of 2019 dated 21.02.2023. Page Nos.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 2. When the matter was called today, Mr.J.Ravindran, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents, submitted that the judgment of this Court made in W.A.Nos.1034 of 2020 and 1384 of 2019 dated 21.02.2023 has been duly complied with and that the contempt petitioners have also availed the benefits. 3. Recording the said submission, these contempt petitions are closed. However, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the compliance order passed by the respondents, it is open to them to challenge the same in the manner known to law. (P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 24-04-2026 ms Page Nos.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 P.VELMURUGAN J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI J. ms Contempt Petition Nos.1647 and 1657 of 2024 24.04.2026 Page Nos.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis