HARBANS LAL AND ORS v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ORS
CWP/11206/2016 · 2026-07-23
Namit Kumar
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2958 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2958 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
254 2024:PHHC:027020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11206-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.02.2024 Harbans Lal and Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd and Ors. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Soni, Advocate for respondents No.1, 3 & 4. Mr. Vikrant Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 5.
NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of J.E. Communication, against the reserve points reserved for Scheduled Caste candidates and further to issue a direction to the respondents to consider the candidates promoted on their own seniority-cum-merit in the general category and not against the reserved category as per the law settled.
2. On 17.05.2023, the following order was passed:-
“Mr. Sharma submits that petitioner No.1 has unfortunately passed away. Petitioner No.3 has retired and petitioners No.2, 4 and 5 stand promoted and in view of the MOHD YAKUB 2024.02.28 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CWP-11206-2016 (O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:027020 aforesaid fact, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Counsel for the petitioners prays for time to seek instructions. On her request, adjourned to 19.12.2023.”
3. None has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners on 19.12.2023 and the case was adjourned to 21.12.2023 and thereafter, on 26.02.2024 also, on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the case was adjourned for today.
4. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today as well.
5. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE 27.02.2024 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2024.02.28 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh