Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2949 (ALL)

GYAN PRAKASH YADAV v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WTAX/222/2024 · 2026-05-05

Piyush Agrawal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 222 of 2024 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Mr. Murtuza Ali, Advocate states that Mr. Anurag Yadav has been engaged as a subsequent counsel by the petitioner and he has no instructions in the matter. List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner(s) to press this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 6, 2026 Rahul Dwivedi/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Yadav, Imran Ali, Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Gyan Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad