WAZIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/10017/2024 · 2026-07-15
Kirti Singh
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2922 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2922 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP No. 10017 of 2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (253) CWP No. 10017 of 2024 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Wazir Singh and Others ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Others .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Prince Pal, Advocate for Mr. Imaan Singh Khara, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Suresh Kumar Aneja, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** KIRTI SINGH
, J. (ORAL)
1. Mr. Suresh Kumar Aneja, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.5 and has filed his power of attorney. The same is taken on record.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though, benefit of wages, for the work done, has been given to the petitioners by the authorities exercising jurisdiction under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 vide
order dated 17.05.2023 but the family members of the petitioners, who were also working with the respondent No.5, have not been granted the said benefit.
3. On being asked to point out as to whether the said workmen/family members of the petitioners were made a party before the authorities concerned or not, learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly RITIKA 2026.07.18 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP No. 10017 of 2024 -2- concedes the fact that they were not made a party before the authorities exercising the jurisdiction under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
4. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the workmen concerned to agitate their claim before the appropriate authorities to claim minimum wages against the work done by them by showing that they had worked with the concerned respondent-brick kiln.
5. Ordered accordingly.
(KIRTI SINGH)
JUDGE July 15, 2026
Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.18 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh