Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2911 (ALL)

KHADAK SINGH @ ARJUN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/43319/2024 · 2026-05-14

Vivek Varma

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43319 of 2024 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Heard Sri Anupam Anand, learned Brief Holder for the State, and Sri Abdul Majid, learned counsel for the informant. The present bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant- Khadak Singh @ Arjun on bail in Case Crime No. 140 of 2024, under Sections 323, 354, 452, 376, 504, 506 I.P.C., 108B B.N.S, 2023 and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kemari, District Rampur during pendency of the trial. In compliance with the direction of this Court, the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Rampur has sent his report dated 26.03.2026, according to which the trial in the aforesaid case has been decided vide judgment and order dated 30.09.2025. Mr. Abdul Majid, learned counsel for the informant, also submits that the trial has been concluded and the applicant has been convicted vide order dated 30.09.2025. In view of the said fact, the present bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. May 15, 2026 SKT/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Vinod Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abdul Majid, G.A. (Vivek Varma,J.) Khadak Singh @ Arjun .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad