STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER
WTAX/1258/2024 · 2026-05-06
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 1258 of 2024 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ petition was entertained by this Court as GST Appellate Tribunal under section 112 of the GST Act was not constituted for preferring appeal against the orders passed under sections 107 or 108 of the GST Act. 3. Now, the Central Government, vide order dated 24.09.2025, has constituted the GST Tribunals and the Members have been appointed vide Office Order No. 03/2025 dated 26.12.2025 with a request to join their respective Benches by 21.01.2026. 4. The Central Government, in exercise of powers conferred under section 111 of the CGST Act, issued notification dated 24.04.2025 making rules for regulating the procedure and functioning of the GST Appellate Tribunal. 5. Once the procedure has been notified and appointments of the Presidents and the Members have been made to the respective Benches of the GST Appellate Tribunal, which itself indicates the functioning of GST Appellate Tribunal are put to motion, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the matter pending before this Court. 6. While entertaining the writ petition, the petitioner(s) was directed to deposit certain amount, in addition to the amount paid under sub-section Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C., Ravi Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shubham Agrawal State Of UP And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner And Another .....Respondent(s)
(6) of section 107 of the GST Act, which might have been complied with by the petitioner(s). For entertaining an appeal, sub-section (8) of section 112 of the CGST Act contemplates condition for depositing certain amount as prescribed in clauses (a) & (b) thereon. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts & circumstances of the case, without entering into the validity and legality of the impugned orders, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- (i) the petitioner(s) is/are permitted to prefer an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal as contemplated under section 112 of the GST Act as well as under the notification issued by the Central Government i.e. Notification No. CG-DL-E- 17092025-266217 dated 17.9.2025, up to the period of June 30, 2026.
(ii) in case the appeal is preferred within the aforesaid period as referred herein above, the same shall be entertained without raising any objection with regard to the limitation; (iii) while entertaining the writ petition, this Court directed the petitioner(s) to deposit certain amount. In case such amount is deposited by the petitioner(s), the same shall be treated as compliance of sub-section (8) of section 112 of the GST Act, for which the petitioner(s) shall furnish a certified copy of the interim order along with proof of deposit of such amount; (iv) the Registrar of the GST Appellate Tribunal or the Officer appointed for verification of appeal shall intimate the petitioner(s) for removing the defects, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of preferring the appeal and the defects, if any, shall be cured/removed by the petitioner(s) within a period of 30 days from the date of intimation of such defects; (v) it is made clear that the appeal shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits. May 7, 2026 Shekhar WTAX No. 1258 of 2024 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad