HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33923 of 2024 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned summoning order dated 17.03.2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (Junior Divisionj, Court No. 20, Deoria and the order dated 29.07.2024 passed by the Additional District and Session Judge/FTC 2nd Deoria in Criminal Revision No. 173 of 2021 (Angad Kumar and another Versus State of U.P. and another) as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 825 of 2020 "Munna Lal Versus Angad Kumar" U/S 4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Deoria, Pending before the Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 20, Deoria. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 11.11.2024, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad. As per Mediation report dated 13.12.2024, the applicants have not complied the order dated 11.11.2024 with regard to deposit of money, hence the notices could not be issued to the opposite parties. On the requ est of the applicants, the matter was referred to Mediation and C onciliation Centre. In the garb of chances of settlement between the parties, the applicants got interim order and did not deposit amount before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre as directed by the Court. About two years, applicants have enjoyed the interim order keeping the Court in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kedar Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Brijesh Kumar Mishra, G.A., Vijyeta Gupta Angad Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) dark. The act of the applicant is not fair and cannot be accepted. On perusal of complaint as well as statement recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C., prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. 3. No interference is warranted by this Court. 4. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. However, if the applicant surrenders before the concerned court within three weeks from today and applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the court concerned, in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 6. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. May 14, 2026 Meenu Singh A482 No. 33923 of 2024 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad