2024:PHHC:059249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CWP-18021-2023 Decided on :30.04.2024 Surjit Kaur . . . Petitioner Versus Appellate Tribunal and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. T. P. S. Chawla, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Despite the matter having been called twice, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. On the last date, fresh notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 4. A perusal of the office report would show that notice could not be issued to respondent No. 2 as correct address has not been filed and notice issued to respondent No. 4 received back unserved. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE 30.04.2024 Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2024.05.02 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment