Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2024 DAILYLAW 28 (MEG)

RISHMA RABHA v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS.

WP(C)/199/2024 · 2026-02-11

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.33 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 199 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11.02.2026 Smti. Rishma Rabha, D/o (L) Captain Rabha, R/o Photamati, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya Represented by the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong. 2. Sub Divisional School Education Officer, Dadenggre, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. The Secretary, School Managing Committee, Photamati (A) Non-Govt. L.P.School, West Gao Hills District, Meghalaya. …Respondents 2026:MLHC:59 2 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.Deb, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K.P.Bhattacharjee, GA with Ms. S.Shyam, GA for R 1 & 2. Ms. E.Thabah, Adv. for R 3. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. S.Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the writ petitioner has since acquired the MTET qualification, she may be allowed to withdraw this instant writ petition and be allowed to file a representation before the respondents for due consideration. 2. Same is not objected to by Mr. K.P.Bhattacharjee, learned GA for the respondents No. 1 & 2 and Ms. E.Thabah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. 2026:MLHC:59 3 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty to the writ petitioner to put in an appropriate representation before the State respondents for consideration. 4. Matter stands closed and disposed of. Judge 2026:MLHC:59 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.02.11 16:30:02 IST