Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2793 (PNJ)

M/S JAI HANUMAN RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND ANOTHER v. SUMITA JAIN

CRM-M/22339/2024 · 2026-07-09

Sanjay Vashisth

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

310 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22339-2024 DECIDED ON: 09.07.2026 M/S JAI HANUMAN RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS SUMITA JAIN .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed for quashing the complaint case, bearing CIS No.NACT/105/2020, dated 02.07.2020, titled as ‘Smt. Sumita Jain vs. M/s Jai Hanuman Rice and General Mills and others’, under section 138 read with section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, as amended upto date read with section 420 IPC (Annexure P-3) and summoning order dated 20.10.2020 (Annexure P-4), passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ganaur, Sonepat, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Today, on the very outset, counsel for the petitioners submits that complaint itself has been withdrawn by the respondent/complainant, vide order dated 30.03.2026 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ganaur. Copy of the said order is produced in the Court and same is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, present petition stands disposed of, as the same having been rendered infructuous. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 09.07.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.07.09 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh