Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2792 (PNJ)

PARVEEN SEMWAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/9740/2024 · 2026-07-06

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP No. 9740 of 2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (228) CWP No. 9740 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.07.2026 Parveen Semwal ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. S.K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Senior Panel Counsel for respondent No. 3. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 08.02.2024 (Annexure P-14) and order dated 22.03.2024 (Annexure P-15) passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (Regional Bench), Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been discharged from the Indian Air Force. Since, one post has already been kept vacant by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, it is prayed that the petitioner be granted liberty to approach the said Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan by filing a representation to consider his eligibility qua the said post and pass appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that if any representation is filed by the petitioner, the claim so raised shall consider and KANCHAN 2026.07.08 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP No. 9740 of 2024 (O&M) 2 be decided with an open mind and an appropriate order thereon will be passed within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of such representation and in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order for not accepting the claim, which reasons will be conveyed to the petitioner as well. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed with liberty to file fresh representation before the respondents. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) July 06, 2026 JUDGE kanchan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.07.08 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment