IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 143 AMIT KUMAR RITU RANI AND ANOTHER CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA directing the second respondent/Presiding Officer, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner/husband seeking visiting rights with respect to Jashrumit Singh. The application taken up for hearing Annexure P- adjourned to 27.08.2024. 2. the application has not been decided. Therefore, a issued for early decision 3. entertain the petition. the case with respect to the application in question after 23.0 Therefore, the reason IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AMIT KUMAR Versus RITU RANI AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of directing the second respondent/Presiding Officer, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner/husband seeking visiting rights with respect to his minor children, Tarushika Singh and Jashrumit Singh. The application was filed before the Family Court taken up for hearing on 23.07.2024, as apparent from the order of even date, -2. Since the arguments were not advanced, the matter was adjourned to 27.08.2024. Learned counsel contended that despite sever the application has not been decided. Therefore, a for early decision. Considering the submissions, this Court finds no ground to ertain the petition. It is not established on record as to what transpire the case with respect to the application in question after 23.0 Therefore, the reasons for not deciding the application cannot be ascertained. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19128-2026 Date of decision: July 01, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent/Presiding Officer, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner/husband seeking minor children, Tarushika Singh and filed before the Family Court and on 23.07.2024, as apparent from the order of even date, 2. Since the arguments were not advanced, the matter was contended that despite several adjournments, the application has not been decided. Therefore, a direction needs to be , this Court finds no ground to is not established on record as to what transpired in the case with respect to the application in question after 23.08.2024. for not deciding the application cannot be ascertained. Date of decision: July 01, 2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondents mandamus directing the second respondent/Presiding Officer, Family Court, Charkhi Dadri, to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner/husband seeking minor children, Tarushika Singh and and on 23.07.2024, as apparent from the order of even date, 2. Since the arguments were not advanced, the matter was al adjournments, needs to be , this Court finds no ground to d in .2024. for not deciding the application cannot be ascertained. JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.08 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-19128-2026 -2- Besides, mere pendency of application before the concerned Court, cannot be a ground to issue a writ of mandamus directing it to decide the same. It has not been shown even prima facie that there has been any lapse or indecision on the part of the Court. 4. In view thereof, finding no ground to entertain the petition, it stands dismissed. July 01, 2026 (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE  Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JASPREET KAUR 2026.07.08 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh