Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2772 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/33386/2024 · 2026-07-06

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 + 215 CWP-33386-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 06, 2026 RAJ KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate, with Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate, and Mr. Satwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, on account of supervening events, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Pending application also stands disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 06, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.07.07 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment