Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 + 215
CWP-33386-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : July 06, 2026 RAJ KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate, with Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate, and Mr. Satwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, on account of supervening events, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
3. Pending application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) July 06, 2026
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.07.07 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment