CRM-M-30584 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (103) SARIKA STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. BNSS, seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent No. 2 by setting aside the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed by this Court, whereby anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No. 2 in case FIR No. 0120 dated 05.03.2022, registered under Sectio 201, and 34 of the IPC (corresponding to Sections 316(2), 85, 115(2), 318(2), 238, and 3(5) of the BNS) at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. 2. inclined to grant the concession sought, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the fresh petition along with all the so as to demonstrate that respondent No bail. -1- 30584-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Sukhraj Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent No. 2 by setting aside the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed by this Court, whereby anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No. 2 in case FIR No. 0120 dated 05.03.2022, registered under Sectio 201, and 34 of the IPC (corresponding to Sections 316(2), 85, 115(2), 318(2), 238, and 3(5) of the BNS) at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. After arguing for some time, and when this Court was not o grant the concession sought, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present fresh petition along with all the zimni orders and other relevant documents, so as to demonstrate that respondent No. 2 has violated the conditions of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30584-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 26.05.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Sukhraj Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent No. 2 by setting aside the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed by this Court, whereby anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No. 2 in case FIR No. 0120 dated 05.03.2022, registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 417, 201, and 34 of the IPC (corresponding to Sections 316(2), 85, 115(2), 318(2), 238, and 3(5) of the BNS) at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS After arguing for some time, and when this Court was not o grant the concession sought, learned counsel for the petitioner present petition with liberty to file a orders and other relevant documents, . 2 has violated the conditions of 26.05.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondent No. 2 by setting aside the impugned order dated 03.07.2024 passed by this Court, whereby anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No. 2 in case FIR No. A, 323, 417, 201, and 34 of the IPC (corresponding to Sections 316(2), 85, 115(2), 318(2), 238, and 3(5) of the BNS) at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS After arguing for some time, and when this Court was not o grant the concession sought, learned counsel for the petitioner petition with liberty to file a orders and other relevant documents, . 2 has violated the conditions of MANJU 2026.06.01 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30584 3. withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits of the case, and the libe the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction of this Court. 5. May 26, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: -2- 30584-2026 (O&M) In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and the liberty granted has been extended only at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction of this Court. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. y 26, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion rty granted has been extended only at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion rty granted has been extended only at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed MANJU 2026.06.01 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document