Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2689 (PNJ)

PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/31088/2024 · 2026-05-26

Subhas Mehla

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

311 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31088-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Pawan Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab. ******* SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the present petition has become as infructuous, as the parties have entered into a compromise. It is submitted that a petition seeking quashing of impugned FIR on the basis of compromise has already been filed before this Court. 2. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of having been rendered as infructuous. [ SUBHAS MEHLA ] 26.05.2026 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2026.05.27 19:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh