ARUN KUMAR SINGH and ORS. v. SRI RAVINDRA KUMAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UNNAO and ORS.
CAPL/1893/2020 · 2026-02-10
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2931 Court No. - 19 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1893 of 2020 Applicant :- Arun Kumar Singh And Ors. Opposite Party :- Sri Ravindra Kumar District Magistrate Unnao And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Farooqahmad,Rahmatullah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Varun Pandey Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Case called out. None present for the petitioner, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. It seems that by the efflux of time, this contempt petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Contempt notices are hereby discharged. If the petitioner feels that the cause of action still survives, he may move an application for recall of the order within eight weeks. Consigned to record. Order Date :- 10.1.2024 Mayank Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench