3-WP-4942-2024 (C).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4942 OF 2024 Shreyansh Motilal Gada ...Petitioner Versus Heena Shreyansh Gada ...Respondent/ with WRIT PETITION NO. 14464 OF 2024 Heena Shreyansh Gada ...Petitioner Versus Shreyansh Motilal Gada ...Respondent ____________________________________________________________ Mr.Vikram Deshmukh a/w Mr.Ativ Patel and Mr.Harshad Vyas i/b AVP Partners, for the Petitioner in WP No.4942 of 2024 and for the Respondent in WP No.14464 of 2024. Mr.K.H. Holambe Patil a/w Mr.Vishal G. Shirsat, for the Petitioner in WP No.4942 of 2024 and for the Respondent in WP No.14464 of 2024. ____________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondent. 2. The Petitioner-Husband and Respondent-Wife have challenged the same maintenance order passed by the learned Family Judge, Mumbai whereby the learned Family Judge has directed the Petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000/- to minor son, Rs.30,000/- to the wife NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.17 10:15:17 +0530 3-WP-4942-2024 (C).doc N.S.Kamble towards house rent and Rs.30,000/- towards educational expenses of son. The wife has challenged the said order for enhancement of maintenance amount. 3. It is contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner-husband that the Petitioner has complied with the order passed by the learned Family Judge and has deposited the maintenance amount till September-2024. The learned counsel further submitted that the son has turned major in year 2022 and presently he is working. This Court may dispose of the Petition, considering the fact that son is not entitled for maintenance anymore and whatever amount has been deposited by the Petitioner is sufficient. 4. The learned counsel for Respondent-Wife submits that the learned Judge has granted maintenance on lower side. He fairly admits that son has attended majority and working but he submits that the maintenance amount awarded by the learned family Judge is on lower side and requested to dismiss the Petition filed by the Petitioner-Husband. 5. I have heard both learned counsel. Perused impugned order. 6. As per impugned order, monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000/- is granted to the minor son, Rs.30,000/- granted as house rent to the wife and Rs.30,000/- granted as educational expenses to the son. I do not find any 3-WP-4942-2024 (C).doc N.S.Kamble infirmity in it, during this period the minor son has became major and he got job so he is not entitled for maintenance and educational expenses. As well as the wife is not entitled for house rent. The Petitioner has deposited aforesaid maintenance amounts till September-2024 before this Court. Henceforth, the Petitioner need not to deposit these maintenance amounts. Though, Petitioner-Wife has claimed enhancement of the amount, I do not find any merit in it as the learned Family Judge has passed well reasoned order. In view of above, I pass following order. ORDER (i) Both the Petitions are dismissed. (ii) All pending Applications are disposed of. 7. The Petitioner-wife shall file Application for withdrawal of the amount deposited before this Court. The learned counsel for Respondent submits that Respondent has no objection to the withdrawal of the said amount. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)