$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 388/2024 and CM APPL. 73665/2024 ADITYA MADAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Advocate with appellant in person versus SHOBHIT MADAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi, Mrs. Yogita Bansal and Mr. Manish Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 12.03.2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties are brothers and that the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to move an appropriate application before the concerned Court. It is stated that the respondent’s share in the property of the father is now available for attachment. 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending application with liberty as prayed for. The application filed, if any, shall be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with law. The respondent shall also be at liberty to raise the objections, as may be available to it. 3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:08:19 merits of the case either way. DASTI, under the signatures of the Court Master. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 12, 2026/na This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:08:19