ABHIJIT A. DUDWADKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER
WP/699/2024 · 2026-09-16
Transfer Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2633 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2633 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
34. WP 699-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.699 OF 2024
Abhijit A. Dudwadkar … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra Through Government Pleader … Respondent
….. Adv. Aseem Naphade a/w Adv. Haamid Ahmad for Petitioner. Smt. Vrushali Kabre, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Adv. Yashi Bhatt i/b Mr. Ravleen Sabharwal for Respondent-S.R.A. Ms. Jyoti Mhatre i/b Smt. Komal Punjabi for Respondent No.3- MCGM. …..
CORAM: M.S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well as for S.R.A. and MCGM.
2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner has invited our attention to the Letter of Intent dated 3rd November 2007, issued by Deputy Chief Engineer, S.R.A. Clauses 13 and 14, reads thus :- RaJesh Chittewan, PS 1/3
34. WP 699-2024.doc
“13. That you shall get the plot boundaries demarcated and the compound wall shall be constructed prior to commencing building works and the same shall be certified by the concerned Architect before requesting for C.C. beyond the plinth level.
14. That you shall accommodate the huts getting cut along with the boundary of the plot demarcated by the staff of the City survey office.”
3. The learned Counsel submits that the Petitioner is one of the occupants of the hut which was getting cut along the boundary of the plot demarcated by the staff of the City Survey Office in terms of clause 14.
4. The Petitioner, therefore, through his Advocate made a representation to the MCGM as well as S.R.A. for deciding his eligibility.
5. Considering the nature of relief in the Petition, we direct the Competent Authority, i.e. the Assistant Engineer (TP), G/South Ward Office of the MCGM to decide the representation dated 20th September 2023, which is at page 117 of the Petition, and in any case within a period of eight weeks of date of communication of this
Order. RaJesh Chittewan, PS 2/3
34. WP 699-2024.doc
6. The Petition stands disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) RaJesh Chittewan, PS 3/3 RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Digitally signed by RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.09.17 13:22:24 +0530