IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1837 OF 2024 M/s. Balaji Advertising …. Petitioner. Vs. Union of India and Anr. …. Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Adkine with Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SUMAN SHYAM & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter is called out. Mr. Adkine, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that the Petitioner was absent even on the previous occasions and no live issue survives in this Writ Petition at this point of time. 2. On perusal of the record we are in agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 3. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands dismissed. The Petitioner, however, is at liberty to seek restoration of the same by furnishing sufficient justification for his non-appearance, if so advised. [ GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. ] [ SUMAN SHYAM, J. ] 1/1 19 WP-1837-2024.doc bdp BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2026.09.17 10:01:34 +0530