Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2616 (PNJ)

NARESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

COCP/4237/2025 · 2026-05-14

Nidhi Gupta

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-4237 IN THE HI 220 Naresh Kum Anurag Rast CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Haryana and any action 10.09.2024 a 2. affidavit of M Panchkula, i 3. aforesaid C compliance have been d survives in th 4237-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o h Kumar and others Versus g Rastogi and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 20.01.2025 (Annex CWP-1351-2025, titled as ‘Lal S and others’ whereby the responden ction regarding re-fixation of pay p 2024 and 24.09.2024 impugned in the Compliance Report dated 20 vit of Ms. Manita Malik, Director Ele kula, is taken on record. Learned counsel for the State re aid Compliance Report dated 20.0 iance of the Writ Court order (Anne been duly disbursed to all the 03 p es in the present petition. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4237-2025 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Lal Singh and others vs. State of pondents are restrained from taking pay pursuant to the orders dated in the writ petition. 20.04.2026 filed by way of tor Elementary Education, Haryana, tate refers to page Nos. 5 to 7 of the d 20.04.2026 to submit that in (Annexure P-1) arrears of pension 03 petitioners. As such, nothing ging Writ e of king ated of ana, f the t in sion hing RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.18 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-4237 4. despite the c last date of h 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 14.05.2026 rishu 4237-2025 -2- There is no representation o e the case having been called twice. S te of hearing, as well. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable tion on behalf of the petitioners, wice. Similar is the position on the above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ers, the are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.18 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.