ANIL MADAM SURYAVANSHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/6663/2024 · 2026-09-04
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2604 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2604 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
wp6663-24.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6663 OF 2024 Anil MadaM Suryawanshi (Died) Through LRs PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Ms. Krutika B. Muttepod h/f Mr. S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. A. A. Jagatkar, Advocate for Respondents No.4 to 7 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 4
th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that since the deceased Petitioner has received all the benefits as sought in the Writ Petition, nothing survives in the Petition.
2. Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp6663-24.doc 2026:BHC-AUG:41195-DB