Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2590 (BOM)

SHRI VITHAL KESHAV SONAR (DIXIT) v. SHRI MANIKRAO DAJI SUDAKE

CP/118/2024 · 2026-09-10

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

60-CP-118-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 118 OF 2024 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2012 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 30994 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2012 Shri Vithal Keshav Sonar (dixit) …Petitioner Vs Shri Manikrao Daji Sudake and ors …Respondents Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Suvarna Yadav, advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. K. K. Sasavade, Mr. R. K. Sasavade, advocate for Respondent No.9 CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 10 SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned advocate has tendered an undertaking dated 10 September 2026 of Respondent No.1. I am informed that similar undertaking has also been filed on behalf of Respondent No.9, which has been uploaded online. In the undertaking filed today, it has been specifically mentioned in paragraph No.3 that Respondent No.1 voluntarily undertakes to assure this Court that: I. No construction or interference shall be there on behalf of himself and his agents and servants from 1/2 Iresh IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2026.09.11 19:07:29 +0530 60-CP-118-2024.doc preventing the Appellant from accessing, inspecting, or enjoying the subject property in any manner. II. That the Respondent will not sell, transfer, assign, gift, or execute any document in favour of any third party in respect of the subject property. III. That the undertaking is given by free consent and without any coercion, undue influence, or misrepresentation. 2. In view of the undertaking given by Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.9, Mr. Kulkarni, on instructions of his client, submits that he is not further pressing the Contempt Petition. 3. Contempt Petition No. 118 of 2024 stands disposed of as not pressed. 4. Second Appeal No. 506 of 2012 to come up for hearing on 9 October 2026. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 Iresh