Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2575 (PNJ)

M/S ANE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/14079/2024 · 2026-05-14

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-14079-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 M/S ANE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Imanbir Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Kirtsimran Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amanpreet (A. P.) Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for respondents No.4 & 5. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 05.03.2026, for compounding offences for the Assessment Year 2014-15, the petitioner has filed a fresh application with the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, NW-R, Chandigarh (for short, ‘Principal Commissioner’) and that the petitioner would be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Commissioner to take a final decision thereupon in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the acceptance of the afore prayer made on the petitioner’s behalf. 3. After considering the facts of the case and the no objection raised by learned counsel for the respondents, we deem it just and JYOTI THAKUR 2026.05.18 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14079-2024 -2- appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Principal Commissioner to take a final decision on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. Needless to add that if the afore application is disposed of by the Principal Commissioner or an adverse order is passed while taking a decision thereupon, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge such order, in accordance with law. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] 14.05.2026 JUDGE Jyoti Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No JYOTI THAKUR 2026.05.18 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document