IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.454 of 2024 Rajendra Kumar Ray …. Appellant Mr. R.Mahalik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Respondent Mr. B.Bhuyan, Sr.Advocate CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 19.01.2026 Order No. 14. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. Mahalik, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel for the State. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant that the property which was purchased by him from the accused company, i.e. Opposite Party No.2, prior to registration of the case against it, has also been attached in the impugned order dated 25th January 2020 of the learned OPID Court passed in I.A. No.06 of 2017. 4. In support of his contention, the Petitioner relies on the sale deed executed and ROR published in his favour under Annexure-4 series. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of granting liberty to the Appellant to approach the learned OPID Court with a prayer to Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Jan-2026 17:36:48 Signature Not Verified exclude his property from the purview of attachment and in the event such a prayer is made by the Appellant within a period of 30 days from today, the learned Tribunal shall consider his prayer accordingly and pass such order upon his satisfaction to exclude such property from the purview of attachment. ( B.P. Routray) Judge S.Das