LALIT KANTILAL SHAH AND ORS v. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND ORS
WP/16380/2024 · 2026-09-10
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2554 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2554 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2.WP16380.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.16380 OF 2024 Lalit Kantilal Shah And Ors. … Petitioners. Versus Pune Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner And Ors … Respondents -------------- Mr. Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Smt. Savina R. Crasto, AGP for Respondent/State. Mr. Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Senior Counsel i/b. R.M. Pethe, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. -------------- CORAM :
M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE :
10th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :
1. Heard Mr. Killedar, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No. 1.
2. An affidavit has been filed by the Respondents stating that there are some disputes between builder and the Corporation as a result of which the building is incomplete. It is obvious that so far as the galas in respect of which allotments are already made in favour of the Petitioners, the same shall not be allotted to anyone except the Petitioners. The Petition is filed at a premature stage. Talwalkar 1
ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2026.09.10 19:08:24 +0530
2.WP16380.2024.odt As and when the building is complete, the Petitioners would be put in possession in terms of the allotment letters. The interest of the Petitioners in terms of the letters of allotment is adequately protected. Liberty to apply in future if necessary is kept open.
3. With the above observations, Writ Petition is disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Talwalkar 2