IN THE H M/S SHRI KRISH STATE OF PUNJA CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr Mr DEEPAK SIBA Thr dated 12.11.2024 ordered attachme attachment in vie 2017, cannot con 2. Lea the settled posi provisionally atta 3. In t direction shall be order release of order dated 12.11 4. In t submits that the p 5. Dis 08.04.2026 Prince Whether speaking/re Sr. No.339 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-855 Date of D RISHNA STEEL RE ROLLING MILL Versus UNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. V.B. Gupta, Advocate for the p Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Pu *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through this petition, the petitioner 1.2024 (Annexure P-1), through which tachment of the petitioner’s bank acco in view of Section 83 of the Central ot continue beyond a period of one year. Learned counsel for the respondents position of law that the petitioner’ lly attached on 12.11.2024, cannot be atta In the light of the above, Mr. Kapoo hall be passed to the respondent-Bank, w se of the petitioner’s provisionally att 12.11.2024 (Annexure P-1). In the light of the afore statement, lea t the present petition is rendered infructu Disposed of. (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU king/reasoned : Yes/No Whether report JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 8553-2026 te of Decision : 08.04.2026 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI he petitioner. ., Punjab. itioner seeks quashing of the order which the respondent-revenue has k account on the ground that such ntral Goods and Services Tax Act, year. dents does not dispute the fact and tioner’s bank account which was be attached beyond 12.11.2025. apoor fairly submits that necessary ank, within ten days from today, to lly attached bank account, through nt, learned counsel for the petitioner nfructuous. EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE reportable : Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.09 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document