[286] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-60179-2024 Date of Decision : 24.03.2026 Shankar Lal ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana through the Additional Chief Secretary, and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Shubham Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4-CBI. Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Ajit Singh Lamba, Advocate for respondent No.8. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) 1. It is submitted by the learned State counsel that a cancellation report in this case has already been submitted before the Ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hisar on 10.11.2025 and notice in the cancellation report has also been issued to the complainant for 04.04.2026. 2. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was a stay operating by the High Court on the cancellation report and despite that, the cancellation report has been filed. The case pertains to the custody death and he is not satisfied with the investigation as complainant was not joined the investigation. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all these pleas before the Ld. Magistrate as notice has already been issued to the complainant in the cancellation report. 4. The present petition is disposed of accordingly. 24.03.2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) Anjal JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.03.25 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document