PARMINDER SINGH v. ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS ASHOKA AND ORS
CRR/192/2024 · 2026-04-07
Anoop Chitkara, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2513 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2513 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-192-2024 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 PARMINDER SINGH ….PeƟƟoner(s) VERSUS ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS ASHOKA AND ORS ….Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Parmider Singh, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. **** ANOOP CHITKARA
, J. (Oral)
1. Seeking enhancement of sentence of respondent Nos.1 to 15 appellant has come up before this Court by filing present peƟƟon.
2. When this Court quesƟons the maintainability of revision peƟƟon for enhancement of sentence, after arguing for some Ɵme, counsel for the appellant submits that he would like to withdraw the present peƟƟon with liberty to file an appeal for enhancement of sentence and compensaƟon which is inadequate under SecƟon 413 of BNSS which corresponds to SecƟon 372 of Cr.P.C. He submits that the Ɵme for which the revision peƟƟon was pending should be exempted and the limitaƟon should start from today.
3. Given above, the present peƟƟon stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that limitaƟon to file appeal shall start form today itself. Pending applicaƟon(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) April 07, 2026
JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANGEETA 2026.04.10 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document