Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2512 (PNJ)

BHINDER SINGH ALIAS BHINDER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/68101/2025 · 2026-03-17

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 126 Bhinder Singh @ State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 110, 115(2), Nyaya Sanhita, on and Sections 03.10.2024] at Police 2. While Bhinder Singh @ any injury as well, petitioner-Bhinder a fatal blow which neck and near the 3. Since concluded investigation, THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-68101 Date of decision: @ Bhinder VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD r. S.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) present first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.154 dated 19.09.2024 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), 127(1), 191(3), 2023 [Sections 103, 126(2) and Sections 110, 127(1) of BNS were deleted Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District While counsel for the petitioner @ Bhinder was not named in the well, learned State Counsel on instructions Bhinder Singh @ Bhinder was also armed which was one of the three gandasa the ear of the deceased-Jaspreet Singh. Since fatal injury is attributed to the investigation, hence, the initial version PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 68101-2025(O&M) decision: 17.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Punjab. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 19.09.2024 registered under 191(3), 190 of the Bharatiya and 238 BNS were added later deleted vide DDR No.33 dated District Sangrur. contends that the petitioner the FIR and was not attributed instructions submits that the armed with Gandasa and gave gandasa injuries on the forehead, Singh. the petitioner herein, as per the version as reflected in the FIR SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 126 CRM-M-68101-2025(O&M) would not be considered over and above the findings recorded by the State after investigating the matter, at the stage of bail. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 17.03.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document