Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2473 (BOM)

GUMANMAL MISHRIMAL MEHTA v. THE CHIEF OFFICER, OF MUMBAI BLDG REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD (M.B.R. AND R.B.)

WP/1645/2024 · 2026-09-07

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20. WP 1645-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1645 OF 2024 Gumanmal Mishrimal Mehta …. Petitioner Versus The Chief Officer of Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (MBR & RB) & Ors. … Respondents ….. Mr. Kantilal Kanojia for the Petitioner. Ms. Sayali Apte a/w Mr. Muralidharan Kalathil i/b Adv. P.G. Lad for the Respondent-MHADA. Mr. Aditya Kathare i/b Mr. Sanket Mungale for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. ….. CORAM: M.S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 7th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. 1. We have heard Mr. Kantilal Kanojia, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Aditya Kathare, the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 5-developers. Ms. Sayali Apte, the learned Counsel for the Respondent-MHADA, submits that the hearing on the aspect of certification of the Petitioner as a tenant of MHADA is already under consideration by the Competent Authority of MHADA. The Petitioner has preferred two representations before the MHADA. RaJesh Chittewan, PS 1/2 20. WP 1645-2024.doc The learned Counsel for the Respondent-MHADA has submitted that though the hearing was scheduled, the same could not be concluded, as the developers are required to be heard. 2. In such view of the matter, it is submitted that the hearing would be scheduled before Chief Officer, MBR & R Board-Respondent No.1, within a period of two weeks from today. The Petitioner as well as Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to appear before the Chief Officer, MBR & R Board on 23rd September 2026 at 11.00 a.m. Within a period of four weeks therefrom, the representations of the Petitioner, which the Petitioner would tender on 22nd September, 2026, shall be looked into and appropriate decision be taken after hearing the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.3 to 5 within four weeks thereafter. 3. Keeping all contentions of the parties open, the Petition stands disposed of. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M.S. KARNIK, J.) RaJesh Chittewan, PS 2/2 RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Digitally signed by RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.09.08 18:01:07 +0530