Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.163 M/s Shiv Shankar Industries State of Punjab and
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE M
Present : Mr. Aman Bansal
Mr. R. S. Pandher
Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J
1.
Learned counsel for the the petitioner’s favour by 10.07.2024 rendered in CWP Mills vs. Food Corporation of India, Punjab
2.
In the light of the abo allowed in the same terms as case (supra).
19.03.2026 vandana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Shiv Shankar Industries
Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Aman Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner R. S. Pandher, Addl. A. G., Punjab. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties agree s favour by judgment of a Division Bench of this Court dated 10.07.2024 rendered in CWP-2038-2011-M/s Shree Padmavati Rice Pulse & Oil Mills vs. Food Corporation of India, Punjab. In the light of the above consensus, the instant petition is also allowed in the same terms as M/s Shree Padmavati Rice Pulse & Oil Mills’s
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7735-2026 Date of decision : 19.03.2026
.…. Petitioner
..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI petitioner. , Addl. A. G., Punjab. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. agree that this petition is covered in
judgment of a Division Bench of this Court dated M/s Shree Padmavati Rice Pulse & Oil ve consensus, the instant petition is also M/s Shree Padmavati Rice Pulse & Oil Mills’s (DEEPAK SIBAL)
JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No VANDANA 2026.03.24 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document